Suffolk Construction Co. v. Illinois Union Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtSikora, J.
This appeal presents an issue of insurance contract interpretation. The issue arises from the language of a policy addendum commonly known as an additional insured endorse*91ment. The setting for the use of the endorsement is the construcindustry.
Background. In 2004, Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. (Suffolk), served as general contractor for the Liberty Place construction project in Boston (project). Suffolk subcontracted the concrete work to S&F Concrete Incorporated (S&F). The subcontract between Suffolk and S&F obligated S&F to require its lower-tier subcontractors to maintain commercial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Cody v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Citation Insurance v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Miller v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Patterson v. Christ ChurchMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
- First Specialty Insurance v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- McLaughlin v. Berkshire Life Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Lowell Development & Finance Corp. v. Winter Hill Bank, FSB (In re Natale)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Mahoney v. American Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.