Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schwabacher

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 26, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

The question raised herein is whether a child born subsequent to the execution of his father’s will and *16not mentioned therein is entitled to the protection afforded by section 26 of the Decedent Estate Law. The will was executed on April 17,1941. Three years prior thereto, the deceased had amended certain life insurance policies upon his life so as to provide for payment of the proceeds to his widow in the event that she survived him or to his then living or thereafter- born children in the event that she did not. Under certain other policies, the children were named as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McLean v. . McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. In re the Estate of FroebNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of KirkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  4. In re the Estate of BackerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. In re the Estate of KaplanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  4. In re the Accounting of HarmetzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of SwensonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API