Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Harmetz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 9, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, S.

In this proceeding for the judicial settlement of the account of the executrix, a question has arisen as to whether a child born subsequent to the execution of his father’s will and not mentioned therein is entitled to the protection provided by section 26 of the Decedent Estate Law. This section reads as follows: “ Whenever a testator shall have a child born after the making of a last will, either in the lifetime or after the death of such testator, and shall die leaving such child, so after-born, unprovided for by any settlement, and neither provided for, nor in any way mentioned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McLean v. . McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. In re the Estate of FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of KirkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  4. In re the Estate of SchwabacherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of CrawfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API