Mercedes Santiago Hodge v. Parke Davis & Company
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court 1
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Appellants Parke Davis Co. (“Parke Davis”), and two corporate officers of their subsidiary, Par-tab (“Labs”), claim that the district court erred in its application of Puerto Rico law and its denial of various motions. For the reasons stated below we affirm.
The facts of this case center around claims charging appellants with negligence in failing to provide a safe work place after appellees, employees or ex-employees, of Parke Davis' contraceptive pill…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Denton.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,496, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,186 Thorburn Kennedy, Trustee v. Josephthal & Company, Inc., Edward M. Swartz and Fredric SwartzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Jose F. Escude Cruz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Colón Prieto v. GéigelSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
- United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Eagleston v. GuidoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Eagleston v. GuidoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Rolon-Alvarado v. Municipality of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,038 Edna Rodriguez-Suris v. Bertha MontesinosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- In Re Lupron® Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.