Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 13, 1967No. Civ. No. 65-562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SOLOMON, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs, Lee and Judy Hoffman, seek to recover $9,345.61 in federal income taxes paid in their 1958 through *8851961 joint returns. The case was submitted on stipulated facts.

The issue is whether the Hoffmans’ payments to a bonding company are deductible as losses in a transaction entered into for profit under § 165(c) (2), Int. Rev.Code of 1954,1 or whether these payments are either nonbusiness bad debts deductible under § 166(d),2 or losses from the sale or exchange of capital assets under § 165(f).3

In 1958, Lee Hoffman organized Lee Hoffman, Inc.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Howell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Shea v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  4. United States v. H. F. Keeler and Alice H. Keeler, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. D. J. ConditCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siple v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  2. Lemoge v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
  3. Worrell v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1967
  4. Siple v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. Siple v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API