Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. D. J. Condit
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
The Commissioner seeks review of a Tax Court decision 1 allowing taxpayer Condit a deduction in the amount of $6,100 as a loss “incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with a trade or business.” 2
The facts are undisputed. Taxpayer and one Conard agreed in 1954 to open a store in Tulsa and to share equally the profits and losses. Taxpayer was a manufacturer’s representative and Con-ard was in the general construction business. Two corporations were formed. One, The Dorman Company (Dorman), owned the land and building where the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Langdon L. Skarda, Carolyn A. Skarda, Lynell G. Skarda, Kathryn B. Skarda, Cash T. Skarda and Annabel S. Skarda v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Shea v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Lloyd-Smith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Santa Anita Consol., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Martin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Siple v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Ruby Smith Stahl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Hudlow v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.