Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. D. J. Condit

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1964No. 7609_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner seeks review of a Tax Court decision 1 allowing taxpayer Condit a deduction in the amount of $6,100 as a loss “incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with a trade or business.” 2

The facts are undisputed. Taxpayer and one Conard agreed in 1954 to open a store in Tulsa and to share equally the profits and losses. Taxpayer was a manufacturer’s representative and Con-ard was in the general construction business. Two corporations were formed. One, The Dorman Company (Dorman), owned the land and building where the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Langdon L. Skarda, Carolyn A. Skarda, Lynell G. Skarda, Kathryn B. Skarda, Cash T. Skarda and Annabel S. Skarda v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. Shea v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  5. Lloyd-Smith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Santa Anita Consol., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  2. Martin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. Siple v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  4. Ruby Smith Stahl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Hudlow v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API