Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Trofholz Technologies, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided March 28, 2013No. Case No. 2:12-cv-665-MEFPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
This case involves claims of race and gender discrimination. Before the Court is Defendant Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 7) filed on August 27, 2012. In its motion, Defendant Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Booz Allen”) claims that Plaintiff Kristal Kaiser (“Plaintiff’) has failed to allege sufficient factual allegations in her Complaint to establish that Booz Allen was her employer for Title VII purposes. Defendant contends that, as a result, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- David L. Morrison v. Amway Corporation, N.K.A. Alticor, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Magic Carpet Aviation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harris v. Med. Transp. Mgmt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Kology v. My Space NYC Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Alvarez v. Bechtel CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
- Cunningham v. Mercedes-Benz U S Intermantional IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
- Harris v. Medical Transportation Management, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.