Legal Opinion
Gubenko v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 14, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered June 21, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the City’s motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Although defendants’ motions were made after the 60-day time limit set by the motion court for summary judgment motions (CPLR 3212 [a]), the court properly considered the motions because they sought relief nearly identical to that sought in third-party and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Filannino v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In the Matter of Weinstein v. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Alvarez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Conklin v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Robinson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ezzard v. One E. Riv. Place Realty Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Ezzard v. One E. Riv. Place Realty Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Ezzard v. One E. Riv. Place Realty Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015