Legal Opinion

Butcher v. Newburger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1935No. Appeal, 248PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Defendants, who are stockbrokers, appeal from the judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, in an action to recover back the amount paid by plaintiff for certain stock purchased by them for him. The purchase was made by the manager of defendants’ office at Atlantic City, N. J., who was authorized to act for them throughout, and all the other matters hereinafter detailed, down to the time of bringing suit, were had with him person ally, and not with defendants or any of them, save as he was their alter ego. Defendants offered no evidence at the trial,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Rothermel v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Fisher v. WorrallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  4. Hurt v. Sands CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Bower v. FennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Robert P. BIGGANS, Appellant, v. BACHE HALSEY STUART SHIELDS, INC., F/T/A Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Berkowitz v. Mayflower Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Ging v. Parker-Hunter Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Rapochi Et Ux. v. Continental Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Cochran v. PoseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API