Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1989No. 2489 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KALISH, Senior Judge.
Darryl Burgess (petitioner) appeals from a decision of the Board of Probation and Parole (Board) finding that petitioner was in technical violation of specified conditions. We affirm.
Petitioner was paroled after serving the minimum of a ten to twenty year sentence for robbery and burglary. The conditions attached to his parole were that he not move from his residence without written permission of the parole staff (condition 2) and that he abstain from the use of illegal drugs (condition 5A).
Petitioner was arrested for violation of these conditions. At the hearing the…
Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zazo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Grello v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Sinwell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Powell v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Watkins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996