Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hildebrand

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1894No. 5293PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Sarpy county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

July 9, 1891, James F. Hildebrand instituted an action in the district court of Sarpy county to recover of the railroad company damages in the sum of $1,000, stating his cause of action in his petition as follows:

“1. The plaintiff complains of the defendant for that said defendant is • a corporation doing business under the laws of the state of Nebraska.
“2. That on or about the 6th day of October-, 1890, said defendant was operating a railroad through Sarpy 'county, said road having been open for use for more than six months iu said county j and while so operating the same at the time above…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Modern Woodman Accident Ass'n v. ShryockNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Newman v. Great Shoshone & Twin Falls Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Estate of Block v. Estate of BeckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Weber v. Thompson-Belden & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Finegold v. Union Outfitting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API