Legal Opinion

Rosenbloom v. Flygare

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1993No. C3-92-323PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

Charles R. Rosenbloom brought this action against Joel Flygare, a deputy sheriff, and Hennepin County, Flygare’s employer, alleging a common law battery and also alleging a violation of Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 4(1) (1986), a section in the Minnesota Human Rights Act which declares it an unfair discriminatory practice “[t]o discriminate against any person in the access to * * * any public service because of race, * * * f)

The jury found that Flygare had committed a battery on plaintiff Rosenbloom and that the battery had injured him. The jury then found that by reason of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Wojciak v. Northern Package Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Kirschbaum v. LowreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Katun Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Terence Michael Clarke, a Florida CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. DeRoche v. All American Bottling Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  3. Daly v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Molenaar v. United Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re the Welfare of S.M.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API