Legal Opinion
Reich v. Consol Energy Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 27, 1995No. Civil Action No. 94-2103Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant, Consol Energy Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Document No. 9) and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 14).
The Court held oral argument on the motions on December 13,1995, and after consideration of the arguments of the parties, the memoranda in support of the parties’ respective positions and the record, the Court will grant the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment (Document No. 14) and deny defendant, Consol Energy, Ine.’s motion for partial summary judgment (Document No. 9).
Factua…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pittston Coal Group v. SebbenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- W. J. Usery, Jr., Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Allegheny County Institution District D/B/A John J. Kane HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Robert Asmar and Kathleen AsmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Joseph P. Connors, Sr. v. Amax Coal Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.