Fox Wisconsin Theatres, Inc. v. City of Waukesha
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
The appellant contends that two errors were committed by the trial court which entitle it to a new trial:
1. That the court improperly restricted the expert witness of the áppellant by not permitting him to testify as to elements which, produced the value in the property which his .appraisal disclosed.
2. That the court rejected evidence that a purchaser was ready, willing, and able to purchase at a price fixed by appellant. •
The trial court ruled that appellant’s witness would be permitted to testify “as to what he bases his estimate as to the value of this property on, without going into…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Watson v. Milwaukee & Madison Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Chaney v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Jefferson Park District v. SowinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Sammond v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bihlmire v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Pinczkowski v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Pinczkowski v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Pinczkowski v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004