Legal Opinion
Michael J. Tait and Monica Tait, His Wife v. Armor Elevator Company, and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 10, 1992No. 91-1378PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Monica and Michael Tait (plaintiffs), appeal a final judgment of the district court in favor of defendants, Armor Elevator Company (Armor) and Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential). The district court exercised diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Plaintiffs brought this negligence action against Prudential and Armor for injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff Michael Tait as a result of an abrupt stop of a descending elevator in which he was the sole passenger.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bielevicz v. DubinonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Molded Acoustical Products, Inc., Debtor. Fiber Lite Corporation v. Molded Acoustical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Edward C. Smith v. Borough of WilkinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- No. 93-5777, 93-5794Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Antonio Williams v. Joseph Rene Esso Virgin Islands, Inc. Scott Drake John Doe, Third-Party Esso Virgin Islands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.