Legal Opinion
Nio v. United States Department of Homeland Security
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 22, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2017-0998Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KUSUMA NIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-0998 (ESH) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are a class of foreign nationals serving in the United States Army’s Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve who enlisted through the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (“MAVNI”) program. The MAVNI program provides an expedited path to citizenship to foreign nationals who are legally present in the United States, possess critical foreign- language or medical…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.