Legal Opinion
Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Woodward
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided July 22, 1931No. Motion No. 9579; No. 1271-5847PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.
In this ease three several parties have filed motions for a rehearing. The plaintiff in error, /Etna Casualty & Surety Company, has filed a motion to reform the judgment which was entered by the Supreme Court upon the recommendation of this Section of the Commission. 36 S.W.(2d) 721. The defendant in error Dallas Plumbing Company has filed a motion for rehearing, as also has the defendant in error Central Texas Iron Works.
In the original opinion and the judgment rendered by virtue thereof, the judgment of the district court and of the Court of Civil Appeals, 31 S.W.(2d) 679, which affirmed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Axtell Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Farmers' Life Ins. Co. v. WoltersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Patton v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. WoodwardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
3Cited by17 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Chandler v. Jorge A. Gutierrez, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.