Legal Opinion

People v. Disa

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 2016No. A137355, A139872PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

Defendant Adam Wade Disa admitted to police that he killed his girlfriend by putting her in a chokehold, but denied he meant to kill her. A jury found him guilty of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187).

Defendant contends there was insufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation, and the trial court erred in admitting evidence of defendant’s prior act of domestic violence. We conclude the evidence of premeditation and deliberation—though far from compelling—was sufficient to sustain the first degree murder conviction. Absent error, we would affirm. However, we…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. Onesra Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
  2. (HC) Cervantes v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. People v. Carpenter CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Davis CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Herr CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API