Legal Opinion

Stamler v. Universal Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1943No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 42,063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiffs, dealers in used cars, suffered a loss by theft of one of their cars and brought suit against defendant which on January 1, 1941, had insured them against loss by theft of all automobiles in the course of purchase and sale. The policy contained a warranty by the insured that the automobiles described therein were fully paid for and there were no liens, mortgage or other incumbrance thereon. It provided that the company would not be liable unless any lien, mortgage or other incumbrance on any property insured was specifically set forth and described in the policy; that the policy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wierengo v. American Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Columbia Bank v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. HolcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wyandotte Brewing Co. v. Hartford Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Jeffords v. Tokio Marine Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daas v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API