Legal Opinion

S.A. v. M.T.O.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 25, 2013No. 2120259 and 2120260PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

These consolidated proceedings concern the propriety of a final judgment entered by the Etowah Probate Court allowing M.T.O. and S.P.O. (“the petitioners”) to adopt a minor child, M.J.B. (“the child”). Because the probate court erroneously determined that a required consent or relinquishment could be implied under the evidence presented, we conclude that the judgment under review is void and, therefore, dismiss the appeals.

On October 15, 2012, the petitioners filed in the probate court a verified petition seeking to adopt the child. In pertinent part, the petitioners averred in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Matter of CozzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. C.J.L. v. M.W.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. E.W.H. v. A.M.P.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. McGowen v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.D.S. v. J.W.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  2. I.B. v. T.N.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API