Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Amy

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to punish respondents for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is an application to punish respondents for contempt for failure to comply with the requirements of two decrees of this court. Before the respondents can be adjudged to be in contempt it must appear not only that certified copies of the *49decrees with which they were required to make compliance were served upon them, but that such service was accompanied with due and proper demand for them to make compliance with the terms of the decrees. Flor v. Flor, 73 App. Div. 262; Delanoy v. Delanoy, 19 id. 295; Bradbury v. Bliss, 23 id. 606; Matter of Scheuer, 161 id. 525; Matzke v. Matzke,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flor v. FlorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Potter v. Emerson-Steuben Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of FlynnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API