Legal Opinion

Potter v. Emerson-Steuben Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.

Plaintiff was appointed permanent receiver of the corporation in the judgment in the action of Zaiden v. Emerson-Steuben Corporation. That was an action by a judgment creditor for sequestration under section 70 of the General Corporation Law. The judgment in the Zaiden case directed in substance that the assets of the corporation be sequestered “ for a just distribution thereof among the fair and honest creditors ” as in cases of a “ voluntary dissolution ” and named plaintiff herein the “ permanent receiver ” with the usual powers. The present action is one such a receiver is expressly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Park v. . ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Myers v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Gray v. CookThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
  4. General Electric Co. v. SireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Lorton v. SeamanNew York Court of Chancery · 1842

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keesing v. WishnefskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  2. Victor v. TuretzNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Fingerhut v. HirschNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. United States v. Government of GuamDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API