Warning v. Warning
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiff, the husband, brought an action for divorce. In the complaint, he charged his wife with having repeatedly accused him of being intimate with other women. The defendant, in her answer, denied this allegation and, by cross-complaint,, sought a decree giving her an allowance as separate maintenance. The trial resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to a divorce. An interlocutory decree of divorce was entered, and in it there was a division of the property and an allowance of alimony to the defendant in the sum of fifty dollars per…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re CaveWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Lockhart v. LockhartWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Underwood v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Krieg v. KriegWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Theis v. TheisWashington Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bartow v. BartowWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Loomis v. LoomisWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Murray v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Patrick v. PatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.