Legal Opinion
Soto v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 1, 2005No. A04A1642PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
Pedro Soto appeals from the grant of summary judgment to CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., in an action he filed seeking damages in connection with his purchase of a used Chevrolet Blazer. Soto sought recovery under several theories, but only his claim of breach of implied warranties is at issue in this appeal. We find that the trial court correctly ruled that Soto presented no evidence that the vehicle was defective at the time of sale, and we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to CarMax.
Soto purchased the used 1997 Blazer from CarMax on May 19, 2001. At…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Dildine v. Town & Country Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- McDonald v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Jones v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Simpson v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Amin v. Mercedes-Benz United States, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- Mitchell v. BACKUS CADILLAC-PONTIAC, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Paulk v. Thomasville Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Matheson v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.