Legal Opinion
State v. Aaberg
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2006No. 23745PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Arvin Aaberg (Aaberg) was indicted on two counts of driving while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, second offense. Aaberg made a motion to suppress all evidence, claiming law enforcement did not have reasonable suspicion to perform an investigatory stop. The magistrate court granted the motion and issued an order suppressing the evidence. The State appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On January 2, 2005, at approximately 10:00 p.m., Sioux Falls Police Officer Nathan Kelderman, (Kelderman), was assisting another officer in taking a report for a stolen vehicle.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BergeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. QuartierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Sound SleeperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.