Legal Opinion
People v. Lake Street Elevated Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 30, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Memorandum.—Quo warranto proceedings. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary
With very slight additions which will follow Judge Brentano’s opinion herein copied, that opinion states the facts involved in this controversy.
That opinion is as follows;
“ Brentano, J. On the 5th inst. there was presented to this court a petition signed by the state’s attorney, Jacob J. Kern, together with the affidavits of Valentine C. Brahm, "William H. Sullivan, Henry Lovi and Gustaf H. Carlson.”
“ The petition asked for leave to file an information in the nature of a quo warranto against the Lake Street Elevated Railroad Company, requiring said company to appear and show by what authority…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Fort Dearborn Lodge No. 214 v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. People ex rel. StoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. Brooklyn, Flatbush & Coney Island Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- People ex rel. Maybury v. Mutual Gas-Light Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- People v.AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910