Chicago City Railway Co. v. People ex rel. Story
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Ebastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
That large and important property interests, as well as the public convenience, are involved in this litigation, is apparent. Elaborate and interesting arguments have been made, presenting the ease, in all its phases, fully and exhaustively. We shall, however, avoid the consideration of all questions having no direct bearing on the decision we are about to announce. After all, in the view we have taken, the case is controlled by elementary principles that admit of but little discussion.
The information filed by the acting Attorney General is in the nature of qtio warranto, is general, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Bishop v. Kingston & Middletown Turnpike Road Co.New York Supreme Court · 1840
- People v. RidgleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by51 opinions
- Kurtis B. Borre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- State ex inf. Hadley v. Delmar Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. DoudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Lasher v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.