Legal Opinion
Franklin Pavkov Construction Co. v. Ultra Roof, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 1, 1999No. 1:96-cv-01297PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HURD, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Franklin Pavkov Construction Company (“Pavkov” or “plaintiff’) alleges that defendant Ultra Roof, Inc. (“Ultra Roof’) breached a subcontract entered into between the two companies. Pavkov claims that Ultra Roof, which subcontracted with Pavkov to retrofit á roof at an Army facility in Rotterdam, New York (“Rotterdam project”), 1 did not timely commence work on the project, unreasonably delayed performance, and abandoned the project without justification. Ultra Roof contends that its duty to perform was…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wechsler v. Hunt Health Systems, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Maris Equipment Co. v. Morganti, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Betal Environmental Corp. v. Local Union Number 78District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Baum v. County of RocklandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- PG 1044 Madison Associates, L.L.C. v. Sirene One, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.