Legal Opinion

City of Vicksburg v. Porterfield

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1933No. 30317PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

This is an appeal by the city of Vicksburg from a judgment against it in favor of the appellee, who was plaintiff in the court below, for damages to appellee’s property fronting on Walnut street in the-city of Vicksburg. The appellee, Mrs. Porterfield, had owned the property so damaged since about 1899. The damage claimed was for permitting a drain sewer, constructed in the street under an embankment by which the water on the west side of the street was to be carried east through a highway embankment, to become entirely obstructed, and the rainfall to be impounded on the west side of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arndt v. City of CullmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. Columbus & Western Railway Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Nesbitt v. City of GreenvilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Whitfield v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Fewell v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Jackson Mun. Airport Auth.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Fortenberry v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  3. City of Tucson v. O'Rielly Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hodges v. Town of DrewMississippi Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API