Legal Opinion

State v. Balthrop

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 31, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

92 N.J. 542 (1983)

457 A.2d 1152

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

JOYCE BALTHROP, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 28, 1982.

Decided March 31, 1983.

Marc J. Friedman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (George L. Schneider, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Herbert I. Waldman, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).

2Per curiam

Tried to a jury, defendant was convicted, as an accomplice, of assault with intent to rob in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:90-2, and of aiding and assisting in the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. State v. BalthropSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. State v. HarkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API