Legal Opinion

Joiner v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1923No. 14005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. “ Where evidence is offered and objected to, and a. portion thereof is admissible and a part objectionable, unless the illegal portion is specified and properly objected to, the whole will be admitteá.” City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (3), 698 (92 S. E. 28); Luke v. State, 26 Ga. App. 175 (1), 176 (106 S. E. 199), and citations. Under this ruling the only special ground of the motion for a new trial is without merit.

2. The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. ScipleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API