Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Vientos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1990Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ellerin, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

While concurring in the conclusion that defendant’s guilt of criminal possession of stolen property should be sustained, I cannot agree that the People established that the value of the stolen computer in this case exceeded $1,000, an essential element of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [1]), the degree of the crime of which the defendant stands convicted.

The "value of stolen property” is defined in Penal Law § 155.20 (1) as "the market value of the property at the time and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. HaroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. ColasantiNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Babigian v. WachtlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API