Legal Opinion

Babigian v. Wachtler

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1987PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, an unsuccessful candidate for Housing Judge, challenges the constitutionality of CCA 110 (f), contending that— rather than Hearing Officers or Referees — Housing Judges are in fact full-fledged Judges; that the power to appoint Judges is an executive function; and that the statutory provision for appointment by the Chief Administrative Judge therefore violates the doctrine of separation of powers. Both lower courts granted defendants summary judgment, declaring the statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Glass v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Rufino v. United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MOTOR VEHICLE MFRS. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. New York State Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers v. KayeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Carella v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Skelos v. PatersonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Babigian v. WachtlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API