Legal Opinion
Jurado v. Kalache
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jeffrey A. Cohen, J.
Motion by the defendant Jean Kalache for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3043 (b), striking the plaintiff’s third supplemental bill of particulars on the grounds that the plaintiff has alleged a new cause of action and/or theory which was not previously pleaded in the complaint or in the original bill of particulars.*
It is ordered that this motion is determined as follows:
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff alleges causes of action for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent. Plaintiff served a bill of particulars on or about June 10,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Acara v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- MacDonald v. ClingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Lightman v. FlaumNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Abdale v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2015
- Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012