R. M. H. v. S. M. H.

HERRMANN, Justice.

This appeal arises in a divorce case in which the plaintiff husband was granted a decree on the ground of incompatibility un*377der 13 Del.C. § 1522(12).1 The defendant wife presents three questions for review:

T

First, did the Superior Court err in finding that the evidence established incompatibility under § 1522(12) ? Wé think not.

The parties separated on three occasions (in 1953, 1956, and 1963) prior to the final separation in 1964, the plaintiff husband returning to the home on each of the earlier occasions for the sake of the children. The marriage was marked by constant…