Legal Opinion

(PS) Peden v. Zaman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 10, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02267Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WESLEY ELVIS PEDEN, Case No. 2:23-cv-02267-KJM-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. SCREENING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND GRANTING HIS APPLICATION TO 14 TARIQ ZAMAN, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 15 Defendant. ECF Nos. 1 & 2 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITH THIRTY DAYS 17 18 19 Plaintiff Wesley Elvis Peden brings this civil action against defendant Tariq Zaman. His 20 complaint, however, fails to state a claim. I will dismiss it with leave to amend. I will grant 21 plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API