Legal Opinion · Dissent
City of Colorado Springs v. 2354 INC.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 8, 1995No. 93SA106Published
1DissentJustice Erickson
I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the El Paso County District Court and hold that Colorado Springs Ordinance No. 92-159 (Ordinance) violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution by imposing a prior restraint on speech and is facially unconstitutional.
On March 19, 1993, the El Paso County District Court issued an order declaring certain sections of the Ordinance and a provision of the 1980 Colorado Springs Code (Code) unenforceable because of facial violations of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The appellants/cross-appellees, the City of Colorado…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.