Legal Opinion

Martino v. Southbridge Towers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The determination that petitioner did not have the right to succeed to the subject apartment upon the death of the tenant of record has a rational basis. The housing company was never notified in writing that petitioner had assumed occupancy in the apartment (see 9 NYCRR 1727-3.6), and when the tenant of record died on January 6, 1999, the only credible evidence that the apartment was petitioner’s primary residence was the affidavit of income filed by the tenant of record in April 1998 listing petitioner as a resident of the apartment. Accordingly, even accepting petitioner’s claim that she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greichel v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Johnson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Cognata v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Matter of Sherman v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API