Legal Opinion

Cognata v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner did not have the right to succeed to the subject apartment since he could not make the necessary demonstration that the unit was his primary residence for the required time period (see Matter of Greichel v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 39 AD3d 421 [2007]). Although petitioner presented evidence of having resided in the apartment, he did not submit evidence in proper form, such as a notice of change or income affidavits, showing that he resided there in the two years preceding the tenant of record’s death (see Matter of Martino v Southbridge Towers, Inc., 68 AD3d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greichel v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Martino v. Southbridge Towers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chang v. Division of HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Matter of Chang v. Division of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API