Legal Opinion
In re Ralph Catino Contracting Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
The petitioner applies for an order directing that the dispute between the parties be arbitrated as provided for in the contract between the parties dated April 5, 1938, and staying all proceedings against the petitioner in the action pending in the City Court, Bronx county. ,
On April 5, 1938, the petitioner, Ralph Catino Contracting Co., Inc., entered into a written contract with the respondent, Gelson Realty Corporation, whereby the petitioner agreed to do concrete and excavation work for the respondent.
Paragraph 18 of the contract contains a clause that “ All questions that may arise under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Matter of Young v. Crescent Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . GoldstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Matter of Haupt v. RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Nagy v. Arcas Brass & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Crompton-Richmond Co. v. William Nelligan, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1956