Legal Opinion

Constructora Ordaz, NV v. Orinoco Mining Company

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 29, 1966No. Civ. A. 3156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAYTON, District Judge.

This is a diversity action arising out of a contract under which the plaintiff, Constructora Ordaz N.V., a Netherlands Antilles corporation (“Conordaz”) obligated itself to deliver pre-stressed concrete railroad cross-ties in Venezuela to the defendant, Orinoco Mining Company, a Delaware corporation (“Orinoco”). The jurisdiction of this Court is not disputed.

The defendant has filed the instant motion, to dismiss the action on grounds of forum non conveniens.

In brief, the defendant urges that Delaware is an inconvenient forum because the contract was to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Mobil Tankers Co. v. Mene Grande Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hodson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  2. Credit Francais International, S. A. v. Sociedad Financiera de Comercio, C. A.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Fiorenza v. United States Steel International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API