Legal Opinion

Ross v. Durrence

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1931No. 8034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

In my opinion this case was tried without due regard to the pleadings as well as without due consideration of the evidence. A verdict cannot be directed in favor of either party unless it conforms to the pleadings as well as to the evidence. In the ease before us, Mrs. Boss asked an injunction to restrain Durrence from proceeding to exercise the power of sale of 20 acres of land contained in a deed to secure debt, upon the ground that the deed was given as security for a debt of her husband, and therefore was void as to her. She also asked that for that reason the deed be set aside and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Barnes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Cain v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. McCook v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Crew v. HutchesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Carmichael Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Patellis v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Williamson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Ross v. DurrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Shepherd v. Life Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API