Legal Opinion

Patellis v. Tanner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1945No. 15131, 15142PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The plaintiff’s exception will be first considered. It relates to the ownership of the 150 acres, which was all the land sued for except the 50 acres embraced in the tax deeds. Since it is admitted in the pleadings that both parties claim under a common grantor, to wit, Moses J. Kirkland Sr., the ownership must be determined upon the comparative strength of the two claims of title emanating from him. Code, § 33-101; Wallace v. Jones, 93 Ga. 419 (21 S. E. 89). The plaintiff holds conveyances from the ultimate remaindermen in the deed from Kirkland Sr. to M. J. Kirkland Jr. and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Allen v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. R.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Mackin v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Patellis v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wasserman v. Franklin CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
  2. Spurlock v. Commercial Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Capers v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Anderson v. StreckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Hubert v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API