Ætna Insurance v. Resh
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. Assumpsit on insurance policy. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.
This case now comes before the court upon the same showing as when here before, with the addition that evidence was introduced tending to show the rate per cent, at which the property was insured, and the ruling of the court that under such evidence the policy was divisible, and that a recovery might be had for the personal property lost. . The prior decision will be found in 40 Mich. 241. As was said when the case was here before, reference was made in the policy to a written application which was declared to be a warranty, and the policy was to be avoided for any omission to make known a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ætna Insurance v. ReshMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Havens v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Phenix Insurance v. PickelIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.