Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2013No. S204387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

This case concerns the admissibility of doctors’ reports in workers’ compensation proceedings. The Court of Appeal granted writ review and annulled decisions by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) restricting the admission of reports from a doctor retained by petitioner Elayne Valdez. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Relevant Statutes

Division 4 of the Labor Code sets out an extensive, regulated system for compensation and medical treatment of employees injured at work. (Lab. Code, § 3200 et seq.) While employers are responsible for the costs of treating injured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Livitsanos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brodie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Tenet/Centinela Hospital Medical Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. tenet/centinela Hosp. v. WcabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Batten v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Batten v. WCAB, Long Beach MemorialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Illinois Midwest Ins. Agency, LLC v. WCAB/RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API