Lester Shinault v. Dick Hawks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
Lester Shinault (“Shinault”) appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment on his claim that state officials violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments when the Oregon Department of Corrections (“ODOC”) froze more than $60,000 in his inmate trust account to recover the cost of his incarceration. The district court held that Shinault received sufficient process because the State held a hearing prior to withdrawing the funds and that he did not suffer an injury under the Eighth Amendment. We affirm the district court on the Eighth Amendment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shinault v. HawksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Lester Shinault v. Dick HawksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015