Legal Opinion
Shinault v. Hawks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 22, 2015No. 13-35290PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 22, 2015, and published at 776 F.3d 1027, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 1032, the following text should be placed in a new footnote inserted after the words < significant sum in the inmate’s account. >:
Our holding is of course limited to circumstances in which the government’s interest arises from recouping incarceration costs. We need not and do not decide here whether, or when, a pre-deprivation hearing is required when the state’s action is motivated by concerns other than those at stake when the government is seeking to defray the costs of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Stephen Yagman v. Eric GarcettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- fhlmc/freddie Mac v. Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Terrance Henderson v. J. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Adrian Miranda v. City of Casa GrandeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Martino Recchia v. City of La Dept. Animal Svcs.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.