Frenia v. Patno
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Appeal from an order of the County Court of Clinton County which denied an application to restore a ease to the calendar from which it had been stricken. The attorney making the moving affidavit states no reason why neither he nor any of his associates answered the call of the calendar at any of four successive terms — those in February, May and October, 1963 and February, 1964 — or otherwise communicated with the court; nor, indeed, why neither he nor any of Ms associates was not available to try the ease at any of those terms; except as the affidavit indicates that deponent was engaged in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Caton v. Schenectady GazetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Lifset v. EhrlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- McNamara v. HutchinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Hunker v. Charbonneau Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986