Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Power

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1933No. 28298PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a foreclosure suit in which the only question involved is the priority between two mortgages. In a former opinion, ante, p. 113, the nature of the case was set out in full. We shall refer hereafter to the owner of the fee as Power, the holder of the first mortgage as O’Connor, and the second mortgage as the bank. Formerly, the court held that, since the first mortgage had not been refiled, as provided by section 20-202, Comp. St. 1929, the bank, being a subsequent incumbrancer for value, acquired a prior lien to the first mortgage. Power executed the O’Connor mortgage April 1, 1914.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fort Scott v. HickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hartley v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Nelson v. BeckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Moffatt v. FoutsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vanice v. OehmNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Alexanderson v. WessmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Johnson v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Old Line Insurance v. StarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API