Legal Opinion

Vanice v. Oehm

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1995No. S-93-447PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

Plaintiff-appellant, Kaer P. Vanice III, seeks in his operative petition to foreclose a real estate mortgage. Finding that the petition failed to state a cause of action, the district court sustained the demurrer of the defendants-appellees husband and wife, Gary L. Oehm and Leslie Oehm, and dismissed the action. Vanice thereafter appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, asserting, in summary, that in ruling the petition failed to state a cause of action, the district court applied the wrong period of limitations. In the exercise of our authority to regulate the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gibb v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Dalition v. LangemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Grant v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Giese v. SticeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Dcs Sanitation Management, Inc. v. Eloy Castillo Efren George Castillo Adolfo MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. Proctor v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Baltensperger v. WellensiekNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API